Reviews of International Center for Language Studies, Washington DC, USA
Total number of reviews: 2
NOTE: All reviews are authentic. Only students who booked their course through us can publish evaluations here, and only after the end of their programme. These evaluations then are not manipulated in any way, neither by us nor by the school, and can be trusted as honest opinions about personal experiences with the school.
Average Rating
Based on 2 reviews of former students of International Center for Language Studies
| Overall rating International Center for Language Studies, Washington DC, USA | 2.0 |
|---|---|
| City | 4.0 |
| Organisation | 2.0 |
| Facilities | 2.5 |
| Social activities | 2.5 |
| Quality of teaching | 2.0 |
| Value for money | 3.0 |
| Accommodation | |
| Homestay | --- |
| Shared Flat (apartment) | --- |
| Other | --- |
Individual Reviews
International Center for Language Studies
8. Sep. 2024
1. Ramon (58 years) Spain
101.Course: Intensive Course [English] - 3 weeks
101.Course: Intensive Course [English] - 3 weeks
Overall rating
Value for money
Detailed review
City/place
School organization
Facilities (library, classrooms)
Social activities
Quality of teaching / language progress
Additional information
Positive aspects of school
It is good localization.
Negative aspects
Every year I went to a new school in different country and this year is the first time that i haven´t received the diploma or certificate.
Other comments
I have been here 3 weeks and i haven't a certificate or a paper with this information.
City/place
It is a good place for visit
Quality of teaching / language progress
Bad organization.
3. Sep. 2024
2. Jordi (18 years) Spain
102.Course: Intensive Course - 3 weeks
102.Course: Intensive Course - 3 weeks
Overall rating
Value for money
Detailed review
City/place
School organization
Facilities (library, classrooms)
Social activities
Quality of teaching / language progress
Additional information
Positive aspects of school
Wonderful locations and some really involved teachers.
Negative aspects
Awful selection of the level and too much bureaucracy. Lack of organisation and of a programme, and the requests of the beginning are not met at the end.
